In memoriam Zoran Pokrovac

We are saddened to note that Professor Zoran Pokrovac, a long-standing member of the Croatian section of the IVR and its president from 2011 to 2015, passed away on 24 September 2025. Professor Ivan Padjen has written an In memoriam, which is available here.

ZLTG Members on the 17th CEE Forum, Split, 25-26th September 2025

Three members of the Zagreb Legal Theory Group participated in the 17th CEE Forum for Young Legal, Political, and Social Theorists, held at the Law Faculty of the University of Split on 25th and 26th of September 2025.

Paula Sviben delivered a presentation titled “The CJEU’s Conceptual Approach to the Rule of Law and Judicial Independence.”

Svan Relac delivered a presentation titled “Is Lex Posterior Necessary in Legal Systems?”

Marianela Delgado delivered a presentation titled “Why Conceptual Analysis Matters in Evidentiary Debates: Lessons from Gender-Motivated Crimes.”

L. Burazin, M. Krešić, I. Tucak, Priručnik za teoriju prava, 3. izd., Naklada Breza, 2025.

The 3rd edition of the Handbook for Legal Theory (authors: L. Burazin, M. Krešić, I. Tucak) has been published by Naklada Breza.
The Handbook presents basic concepts suitable for describing and analyzing law using examples from Croatian legislation and case law. It illustrates, through concrete examples, various types of legal norms, subjective rights, constitutional court techniques (such as constitutional overinterpretation, conforming statutory interpretation, and balancing of principles), normative hierarchies, methods for resolving antinomies (lex posterior, lex superior, lex specialis), interpretation techniques, legal arguments (such as the ordinary meaning of words, legislative intent, a contrario, analogy, dissociation), legal construction techniques, and schemas for analyzing judicial reasoning.

The Handbook relies on analytical tools from R. Guastini’s book The Syntax of Law, Naklada Breza, 2025 (5th ed.).

The Handbook can be purchased via the publisher’s website (https://naklada-breza.hr/pravo/prirucnik-za-teoriju-prava-3-izdanje/).

CfP: 17th Central and Eastern European Forum of Young Legal, Political and Social Theorists

17th Central and Eastern European Forum of Young Legal, Political and Social Theorists will take place on 25-26th September 2025 in Split, Croatia. The conference is aimed at students, PhD students as well as young post-docs and professors coming from all over the world (not only from Central and Eastern Europe).


The conference language is English. If you wish to participate, please send an abstract of about 300-500 words at ceeforum2025@pravst.hr by 10 June 2025.

A detailed CfP can be found here.

CfP: CEENJ 2025

The 2025 (CEE)NJ (Central and Eastern European Network of Jurisprudence) Conference is to take place at the premises of the Mykolas Romeris University in VIlnius (Lithuania), Faculty of Law on September 18-20, 2025.

The topic of the the 2025 CEENJ conference is “Jurisprudence in Central and Eastern Europe: Work in Progress 2025”.

Contributions to the whole gamut of jurisprudential issues, from legal philosophy and theory to social, psychological, economic or other theories of law, are welcome. Dogmatic (doctrinal) and empirical (historical, sociological, economic, etc.) studies of law with a strong conceptual content are also acceptable. The 2025 CEENJ Conference will also be open to participants working and/or residing outside the European area.

The deadline for submitting applications is June 15, 2025.

For more detail, see please see the official Call for Papers.

K. E. Himma, The Practical Otiosity of Exclusionary Reasons

K. E. Himma (Legal Theory Department, Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb) published The Practical Otiosity of Exclusionary Reasons in the Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 37(2) 2024, pp. 457 – 473

Abstract

One of Joseph Raz’s most influential contributions to legal philosophy is the Exclusionary Thesis, according to which any prescription that counts as mandatory is identical with an exclusionary reason that bars acting on certain reasons favoring noncompliance. This essay argues that exclusionary reasons are otiose in the sense there is no deliberative work they are ever needed to do under objective norms of practical reasoning.

J. v. H. Holtermann, M. Krešić, M. Novak (eds.), Legal Consciousness (Springer 2025)

The book is based on presentations and discussions at the special workshop “The Concept of Legal Consciousness” held in Bucharest, Romania, on 7 July 2022, as part of the 30th Biennial World Congress of the International Association for the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy (IVR). The workshop focused on the importance of this concept for legal theory, legal sociology and legal psychology (“psychology and law”). The book consists of fourteen contributions, divided into four thematic parts, dealing with the following topics: the concept of law, the methodology of legal science, the role of legal consciousness in legal theory and legal sociology, adjudication, constitutionalisation, modification of the legal system and deliberate normative change.